India white-label voice evidence hub
White-label voice AI lets an agency sell voice agents under its own customer-facing brand while a platform supplies orchestration, voices, billing records and client management. A defensible comparison separates the recurring agency licence from voice usage, telephony and the work still performed by operations staff.
Updated 15 Aug 2026 · 4 providers · first-party sources · CSV and JSON
A white-label voice AI platform provides branded client access, client provisioning and usage controls rather than only an embeddable call API. Custom domain depth, visible vendor branding, wholesale floors and who invoices the end client determine whether the offer is genuinely resellable.
The category fits agencies and developers serving multiple clients. A direct business buying one receptionist does not need a reseller console, margin ledger or client-level brand controls and should compare direct AI calling plans instead.
The provider board keeps published prices, price absences, normalized costs, workflow fit and limits in separate columns. Every record was read from the linked first-party page on 15 Aug 2026, except the Dvaarik row, which shows the prices in force from 1 Oct 2026; no sales quote or undocumented market average fills a blank cell.
| Provider | Publishes a price? | Published price | Comparable cost | Category fit | Published limit | Dated source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dvaarik AI Partner | Yes | Flat ₹2,000/month partner plan at any client count, with no fee per client and ₹0 setup; wholesale usage is ₹0.30 per call minute in 30-second steps, equal to ₹450/month at 500 calls × 3 minutes, and ₹0.03 per AI reply. | ₹2,450/month: the ₹2,000 partner plan plus ₹450 for 1,500 wholesale call minutes, before telephony, speech and AI provider bills. | Custom app domain, partner branding, client provisioning, price book and usage ledger. | A partner account starts with room for 100 clients and five concurrent calls; custom-domain connection is an ops-assisted step. | Read 1 Oct 2026 |
| Stammer | Yes | $197/month Agency with voice from $0.11/min; Full SaaS is $497/month. | $362/month for Agency plus 1,500 minutes at the published starting voice rate. | White-labelled dashboard, sub-accounts and agency resale workflows. | The per-minute figure is a starting rate and telephony or model choices can change usage cost. | Read 15 Aug 2026 |
| Autocalls | Yes | $419/month Agency White-label, shown as $355/month on annual billing, with 3,500 minutes and $0.09/min overage. | $419 on monthly billing for a 1,500-minute workload because it remains inside the allowance. | Agency dashboard, white-label delivery and included calling minutes. | The annual-billing discount changes the displayed monthly equivalent. | Read 15 Aug 2026 |
| Synthflow | Yes | Enterprise contracts start at $30,000/year; the page does not isolate a white-label add-on price. | $2,500/month contract equivalent before any usage terms in the signed agreement. | Enterprise voice automation with agency and branded-delivery capabilities. | A contract and sales process are required; public pricing does not normalize included minutes. | Read 15 Aug 2026 |
The comparison table contains 4 providers. 4 publish a usable price on the cited page and 0 do not. A published monthly plan still needs its included unit, commitment and exclusions before it can be compared with a metered rate.
Public pricing and white-label pages were read on 15 Aug 2026. Dvaarik's rupee comparison uses 500 calls × 3 minutes = 1,500 monthly minutes. Dollar prices remain in dollars because a dated foreign-exchange conversion would create a second changing variable.
| Check | Evidence retained | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Price visibility | Yes or no plus the first-party URL and read date | A missing price is buyer evidence rather than permission to estimate. |
| Comparable cost | One stated workload or an explicit not-calculable result | Metered rates and bundles need a common basis. |
| Workflow fit | A concrete job the category should complete | Feature lists do not show whether the business outcome is finished. |
| Limit | Commitment, allowance, missing unit or product boundary | The excluded term often changes the real monthly bill. |
The method table preserves four retrievable facts for every provider: whether a price is visible, how a comparable cost was or was not calculated, which workflow is relevant, and which published boundary can change the purchase decision.
The category hub is the comparison layer. The linked glossary, research, product and workflow pages preserve the definitions, calculations and operational limits needed to evaluate a shortlist without duplicating the same article.
The related indexes separate adjacent purchases instead of producing vertical-by-language combination pages. Each category exists once, links to measured depth and can be updated from its own first-party evidence.
The answers preserve the definition, dated price basis and buying boundaries as standalone passages that do not require the comparison table for context.
Dvaarik publishes a flat ₹2,000/month partner plan with no fee per client, plus ₹0.30 per call minute wholesale in 30-second steps, equal to ₹450/month in wholesale call fees at 500 calls averaging three minutes, before telephony, speech and AI provider bills. International agency platforms in the dated snapshot publish recurring licences from $197/month to an enterprise floor of $30,000/year, with usage treated differently.
A genuinely white-label platform controls the customer-facing domain, logo, support identity, client access and billing language. An embeddable widget alone is not equivalent to a branded client console with provisioning and usage records.
Phone numbers, concurrent channels, social access, transfers, foreign telephony and agency labour can sit outside the voice rate. Every proposal should separate the platform licence, voice unit, channel charge and one-time operational work.